Public engagement
- Staff conducted extensive public engagement over the last five years to better understand community perspectives. The primary engagement was an Off-Leash Area Review initiative in 2022. A What We Heard Report highlights the engagement efforts within the review, and key themes emerging from public feedback.
- Feedback from the Off-Leash Area Review revealed a range of perspectives from residents, both opposed to and in favour of off-leash trail space.
- Further engagement through the Outdoor Enjoyment Strategy and ongoing conversations with residents highlighted concerns with incidents involving off-leash dogs.
- Residents have also formally submitted concerns about trail safety outside of engagement initiatives, with some reports of serious injuries resulting from incidents with off-leash dogs.
Resident needs
- Safety: Residents have stated they want to feel safe when using trails, parks and open spaces. There has been a reported decrease in trail use due to the unpredictability of off-leash animals. This change to off-leash areas addresses and errs on the side of public safety.
- Clarity & Predictability: Residents indicated a need for more clarity on which spaces are on and off-leash, maps, enforcement, and what to expect when entering on and off-leash areas.
Incidents - low frequency, high severity, and underreported
- Public engagement uncovered significant accounts of residents who had been subjected to or witnessed severe incidents on the trails involving off-leash dogs. Victims of these incidents include, but are not limited to, children, people on mobility scooters or with other accessibility requirements, other vulnerable trail users, and wildlife.
- Engagement also uncovered that residents often underreport incidents. This may be due to difficulty enforcing, providing more than verbal proof, lack of resolve, etc. The number and severity of incidents is likely higher than the number indicated through recorded service requests and MHPS statistics.

